Source · Paper

Alpöge–Furman · simple zeros on the line

Overview

Alpöge–Furman · simple zeros on the line

August 2026 preprint. Named mathematical authors explicitly state that they verified the proof and take responsibility. Journal acceptance and independent OpenMath expert review are not established.

Passages

The exact passages cited in OpenMath. Each passage identifies how its wording was recorded.

Passage index · 5
  1. Pinned Anthropic README, Solution.lean and formalization.yaml; Appendix A
  2. Theorem B, p. 2: fixed primitive χ; constants may depend on conductor
  3. Theorem B and §1: primitive Dirichlet L-functions; RH not assumed in the proportion bound
  4. Theorem A(ii), Montgomery–Taylor refinement
  5. Theorem A, pp. 1–2; Montgomery–Taylor window; Remark 6.1
Passage 1 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

Pinned Anthropic README, Solution.lean and formalization.yaml; Appendix A

Anthropic publishes a Lean formalization and an operator audit for the zeta proportion theorem.

Passage details

Passage ID: riemann-hypothesis:rh-anthropic-formal-audit:v1

Source item: arxiv-2608.13637#rh-anthropic-formal-audit

Source record: arxiv-2608.13637@arxiv-v2

Passage 2 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

Theorem B, p. 2: fixed primitive χ; constants may depend on conductor

The simple-on-line and distinct-zero bounds extend to each fixed primitive Dirichlet L-function.

Passage details

Passage ID: riemann-hypothesis:rh-dirichlet-fixed-bound:v1

Source item: arxiv-2608.13637#rh-dirichlet-fixed-bound

Source record: arxiv-2608.13637@arxiv-v2

Passage 3 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

Theorem B and §1: primitive Dirichlet L-functions; RH not assumed in the proportion bound

The corresponding all-zeros-on-line conjecture for Dirichlet L-functions is a broader target.

Passage details

Passage ID: riemann-hypothesis:rh-dirichlet-grh:v1

Source item: arxiv-2608.13637#rh-dirichlet-grh

Source record: arxiv-2608.13637@arxiv-v2

Passage 4 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

Theorem A(ii), Montgomery–Taylor refinement

The proportion of distinct zeros relative to total multiplicity has liminf at least (1+k₀)/2.

Passage details

Passage ID: riemann-hypothesis:rh-distinct-proportion:v1

Source item: arxiv-2608.13637#rh-distinct-proportion

Source record: arxiv-2608.13637@arxiv-v2

Passage 5 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

Theorem A, pp. 1–2; Montgomery–Taylor window; Remark 6.1

An unconditional asymptotic lower bound k₀ = 3/2 − cot(1/√2)/√2 holds for simple critical-line zeros relative to total multiplicity.

Passage details

Passage ID: riemann-hypothesis:rh-simple-line-af:v1

Source item: arxiv-2608.13637#rh-simple-line-af

Source record: arxiv-2608.13637@arxiv-v2

Used in

Explicit citations in versioned problem publications. A citation records a use; it does not confer proof or independent verification.

Riemann hypothesis →

Problem publication v13

Partial bounds for a fixed Dirichlet character →

Source assessment

Proved

Scoped theorem in cited source

Only the exact statement, domain and revision cited by this Claim; this is not a resolution of classical RH or independent OpenMath expert assessment.

Source date Aug 19, 2026 · Observed Oct 10, 2026

Dirichlet GRH implies classical RH →

Source assessment

Proved

Exact scoped statement in cited source

Only the cited assertion with its exact assumptions. This report does not resolve the canonical Problem or establish independent OpenMath mathematical review.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

Generalized RH for Dirichlet L-functions →

Source assessment

Open

All-zero Dirichlet GRH target remains conjectural

Only the exact statement, domain and revision cited by this Claim; this is not a resolution of classical RH or independent OpenMath expert assessment.

Source date Aug 19, 2026 · Observed Oct 10, 2026

At least 83.625% distinct zeros, asymptotically →

Source assessment

Proved

Scoped theorem in cited source

Only the exact statement, domain and revision cited by this Claim; this is not a resolution of classical RH or independent OpenMath expert assessment.

Source date Aug 19, 2026 · Observed Oct 10, 2026

More than 67.25% simple zeros on the line, asymptotically →

Source assessment

Proved

Scoped theorem in cited source

Only the exact statement, domain and revision cited by this Claim; this is not a resolution of classical RH or independent OpenMath expert assessment.

Source date Aug 19, 2026 · Observed Oct 10, 2026

Problem context · 10 citations

Research activity

Claude discovery and Anthropic’s reported Lean verification

The paper’s human authors take responsibility for a Claude-discovered proof. The pinned Lean repository reports proofs for actual zeta, with standard axioms and comparator verification; dependencies and declarations are linked for inspection.

A model-written manuscript, an author-reviewed theorem and a kernel-check report are different evidence. OpenMath has not run the proof; no independent reproduction is asserted.

Further reading

Read the mathematical argument; inspect its Claim for assessment and scope.

Research activity

From infinitely many on-line zeros to proportion bounds

Hardy proved infinitely many zeros lie on the line; later work established positive proportions. The August 2026 paper identifies the previous simple-on-line benchmark as 5/12 and improves it to k₀ ≈ 0.6725007. Its proportion metric differs from finite-height verification.

A historical source’s old numerical records are not today’s best bounds. The selected papers are milestones, not an exhaustive priority history; new submissions stay separately attributed.

Files

Linked manuscripts, code and data. External proof reports, statement correspondence and OpenMath execution are separate checks.

PDF

Proof PDF · v2 ↗

Manuscript / exposition · external

External source evidence; no OpenMath execution or independent reproduction is attached.

Resource revision: arXiv:2608.13637v2

Formal code

Anthropic Lean solution · pinned commit ↗

Source-reported evidence

Repository reports a Mathlib riemannZeta proof with standard Lean axioms, comparator checks and no RH premise. Challenge.lean contains statement placeholders; Solution.lean supplies the proof chain. OpenMath has not built or audited the dependencies.

Resource revision: 2bafb8c88f177284a2123b5fefa2ff84e2365eb6

Project notes

Anthropic statement and dependency audit ↗

Source-reported evidence

Author/operator audit and toolchain are documented at this commit. This is an external checking report, not an OpenMath Run.

Resource revision: 2bafb8c88f177284a2123b5fefa2ff84e2365eb6

Credits

Recorded authorship

Levent Alpöge · Ralph Furman

Levent Alpöge; Ralph Furman

AI involvement reported by the source

The paper credits Claude (Anthropic) with discovery and writing; Alpöge and Furman with verification, Jarred Sumner with guiding the investigation, and Eric Easley with orchestrating Lean formalization. Company attribution is source-reported, not independently reproduced here.

Versions

OpenMath source records preserve exact citations. Observation dates order these records; they do not establish the latest upstream paper or proof.

  1. arxiv-v2 · selectedObserved Oct 10, 2026 · used in current publications

    Alpöge–Furman · simple zeros on the line

Record details
Source ID
arxiv-2608.13637
Record ID
arxiv-2608.13637@arxiv-v2
Recorded title
Alpöge–Furman · simple zeros on the line
Revision
arxiv-v2
Observed
Oct 10, 2026
Source updated
Aug 19, 2026
Content SHA-256
Not recorded
Update method
Manual source and revision check; recheck upstream before a new publication.
Identifier policy
Stable bibliographic identifier and explicit revision; theorem locators belong to source entries.
Check interval
30 days
Rights
metadata-link
License
Links and original OpenMath paraphrases only; upstream license governs external files.

No upstream full text or code is republished by this record.

Source terms ↗