Open
Exact scoped statement in cited source ↗
Only the cited assertion with its exact assumptions. This report does not resolve the canonical Problem or establish independent OpenMath mathematical review.
Observed Oct 10, 2026
Conjecture · version 3
For every elliptic curve over , , where L is the full Hasse–Weil L-function with all finite Euler factors.
The canonical rank question. It does not by itself assert finite Sha or the precise leading coefficient.
Open
Only the cited assertion with its exact assumptions. This report does not resolve the canonical Problem or establish independent OpenMath mathematical review.
Observed Oct 10, 2026
In this problem · publication v13 · Selected context
Primary formulation · Open
The strong assertion includes the rank statement and additional arithmetic information.
Proving rank equality alone does not prove finite Sha or the leading coefficient.
Open · version 3
For every , let . Then , is finite, and .
Scope: A stronger open assertion. Normalizations must be consistent; rank equality and one p-part do not imply the full formula.
Open · version 3
For every elliptic curve over , , where L is the full Hasse–Weil L-function with all finite Euler factors.
Scope: The canonical rank question. It does not by itself assert finite Sha or the precise leading coefficient.
Relationship statement · Proved · version 2
If the full BSD assertion holds for every E/Q, then BSD rank equality holds for every E/Q and Sha(E/Q) is finite for every E/Q.
Scope: A one-way implication by the definition of the stronger conjecture; no converse from rank equality is asserted.
Relationship not independently reviewed.
Connection in Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture →Rank BSD specialized to E_n would supply the missing sufficient direction of Tunnell’s exact counting criterion.
This implication is restricted to the stated odd squarefree congruent-number curves.
Open · version 3
For every elliptic curve over , , where L is the full Hasse–Weil L-function with all finite Euler factors.
Scope: The canonical rank question. It does not by itself assert finite Sha or the precise leading coefficient.
Proved · version 2
For every odd positive squarefree integer n, assuming BSD rank equality for E_n: y² = x³−n²x, n is the area of a right triangle with positive rational side lengths if and only if #{(x,y,z)∈Z³: 2x²+y²+8z²=n} = 2·#{(x,y,z)∈Z³: 2x²+y²+32z²=n}.
Scope: A proved conditional criterion with two finite counts. The necessary direction is unconditional; this selection omits the different even-n formula.
Relationship not independently reviewed.
Connection in Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture →Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
In this problem · publication v17
Primary formulation · Open
The strong assertion includes the rank statement and additional arithmetic information.
Proving rank equality alone does not prove finite Sha or the leading coefficient.
Open · version 3
For every , let . Then , is finite, and .
Scope: A stronger open assertion. Normalizations must be consistent; rank equality and one p-part do not imply the full formula.
Open · version 3
For every elliptic curve over , , where L is the full Hasse–Weil L-function with all finite Euler factors.
Scope: The canonical rank question. It does not by itself assert finite Sha or the precise leading coefficient.
Relationship statement · Proved · version 2
If the full BSD assertion holds for every E/Q, then BSD rank equality holds for every E/Q and Sha(E/Q) is finite for every E/Q.
Scope: A one-way implication by the definition of the stronger conjecture; no converse from rank equality is asserted.
Relationship not independently reviewed.
Connection in Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture →Rank BSD specialized to E_n would supply the missing sufficient direction of Tunnell’s exact counting criterion.
This implication is restricted to the stated odd squarefree congruent-number curves.
Open · version 3
For every elliptic curve over , , where L is the full Hasse–Weil L-function with all finite Euler factors.
Scope: The canonical rank question. It does not by itself assert finite Sha or the precise leading coefficient.
Proved · version 2
For every odd positive squarefree integer n, assuming BSD rank equality for E_n: y² = x³−n²x, n is the area of a right triangle with positive rational side lengths if and only if #{(x,y,z)∈Z³: 2x²+y²+8z²=n} = 2·#{(x,y,z)∈Z³: 2x²+y²+32z²=n}.
Scope: A proved conditional criterion with two finite counts. The necessary direction is unconditional; this selection omits the different even-n formula.
Relationship not independently reviewed.
Connection in Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture →Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
For every elliptic curve E/Q, rank E(Q) equals ord_{s=1} L(E,s).
paraphrase · No upstream full text or code is republished by this record.
Strong BSD predicts rank equality, finite Sha, and the leading coefficient formula with real period, regulator, Tamagawa factors and torsion.
paraphrase · No upstream full text or code is republished by this record.
For odd positive squarefree n, BSD for y²=x³−n²x would make a finite ternary-quadratic count criterion equivalent to being a congruent number.
paraphrase · No upstream full text or code is republished by this record.
Andrew Wiles · Published
Official Clay problem description; separates rank equality from its refined formula.
Source revision: official-description. Observed Oct 10, 2026.
The cited work does not report AI involvement; this is not an assertion that no AI was used.
Official description PDF: official-description. External evidence linked; no OpenMath execution or independent reproduction is asserted.
Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.
Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.
Open
Only the cited assertion with its exact assumptions. This report does not resolve the canonical Problem or establish independent OpenMath mathematical review.
Observed Oct 10, 2026 · Source passage →