The assertion that every rational (p,p) class on every compact Kähler manifold is a rational combination of analytic cycle classes is false; complex-torus counterexamples are recorded in the cited description.
Assumptions
Compact Kähler complex manifolds, without the projectivity assumption.
Analytic cycle classes and rational coefficients.
Scope
A refuted different-domain extension; it is not a counterexample among smooth projective varieties.
Only the cited assertion with its exact assumptions. This report does not resolve the canonical Problem or establish independent OpenMath mathematical review.
The assertion that every rational (p,p) class on every compact Kähler manifold is a rational combination of analytic cycle classes is false; complex-torus counterexamples are recorded in the cited description.
Compact Kähler complex manifolds, without the projectivity assumption.
Analytic cycle classes and rational coefficients.
Scope: A refuted different-domain extension; it is not a counterexample among smooth projective varieties.
The assertion that every rational (p,p) class on every compact Kähler manifold is a rational combination of analytic cycle classes is false; complex-torus counterexamples are recorded in the cited description.
Compact Kähler complex manifolds, without the projectivity assumption.
Analytic cycle classes and rational coefficients.
Scope: A refuted different-domain extension; it is not a counterexample among smooth projective varieties.
Only the cited assertion with its exact assumptions. This report does not resolve the canonical Problem or establish independent OpenMath mathematical review.