Theorem · version 1

Proposed rationality of specialized Hodge pairings

Earlier version 1. View current version 2 →

Statement

Let A/Qbar have dimension d and good reduction A₀/Fpbar at a fixed p-adic place, and let γ be a rational Hodge class of degree 2r. For every list of d−r Cartier divisors on A₀, the trace of the specialized γ times their classes is a common q ∈ Q in every ℓ-adic realization (ℓ ≠ p) and in the specified de Rham–crystalline realization.

Assumptions

  • A over Qbar, embedded in C, with good reduction after finite descent and extension at the chosen place.
  • 0 ≤ r ≤ d; top-Tate-twist trace normalized to degree of a zero-cycle.
  • The crystalline comparison and divisor-product conventions of Theorem 1.1.

Scope

A provider proposal about rationality of pairings at one reduction place. Rationality alone is weaker than producing an algebraic representative for every complex Hodge class.

This source presents a theorem with a proposed proof. Its wording does not establish acceptance or independent mathematical review.

Evidence

Source reports

Connections

In this problem · publication v7 · Selected context

Hodge conjecture →

Different statement · related variant · Proposed

Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.

In this problem · publication v8

Hodge conjecture →

Different statement · related variant · Proposed

Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.

Sources

OpenAI · proposed Milne rationality theorem →

  • Theorem 1.1, PDF pages 1–2 → · Original passage ↗
    Recorded wording

    The provider claims that specialized rational Hodge classes pair with complementary products of divisors as one rational number in prime-to-p and crystalline realizations.

    paraphrase · Only metadata and original OpenMath paraphrases are published; full text stays upstream.

OpenAI · Preprint · Publication date Oct 7, 2026

Provider preprint in the October 2026 public collection. The selected manuscript is a proposal here; a release announcement is not independent expert acceptance.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: fd4aeeb2ee4fc729c18d98444fed42fd0529eeeb. Observed Oct 10, 2026.

The provider attributes this manuscript to its internal AI model. Mathematical acceptance, paper-to-formal correspondence and independent reproduction are not established by OpenMath.

OpenAI · proposed Milne rationality theorem — manuscript: fd4aeeb2ee4fc729c18d98444fed42fd0529eeeb. External manuscript. No OpenMath proof execution, formalization or independent mathematical acceptance is inferred.

History

Statement versions

Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.

Assessment history · 1

Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.

Record details
Claim ID
claim-hodge-openai-milne-proposal
Statement version
1
SHA-256
d4c431a765c02082638ed8bb7ff9c05ae8d5960aaadf244cf738fb31951cae38

Publication records