Proved
Exact scoped statement in cited source ↗
Only the cited assertion with its exact assumptions. This report does not resolve the canonical Problem or establish independent OpenMath mathematical review.
Observed Oct 10, 2026
Theorem · version 3
If A is a complex abelian fourfold of Weil type with discriminant 1, the rational Hodge conjecture holds for A^m for every positive integer m.
All codimensions on powers of this specified Weil-type family.
Proved
Only the cited assertion with its exact assumptions. This report does not resolve the canonical Problem or establish independent OpenMath mathematical review.
Observed Oct 10, 2026
Proved
Floccari–Fu · Weil fourfolds and powers · Theorem 1.2 and its proof, PDF pages 2 and 16 →
Source dated Feb 10, 2026 · Observed Oct 10, 2026
In this problem · publication v13 · Selected context
Special case · Proved
For m=1 this overlaps Markman’s fourfold corollary; m>1 covers selected varieties of dimension 4m. The discriminant-1 hypothesis is retained for the all-powers assertion.
Scope: Every power of a Weil-type fourfold with discriminant 1.
Limit: Does not assert the all-powers statement for arbitrary discriminants or arbitrary abelian varieties.
The all-abelian-fourfold theorem and the all-powers theorem intersect at a single Weil fourfold with discriminant 1.
One covers every abelian fourfold but not all its powers; the other covers all powers of a smaller family.
Proved · version 2
The rational Hodge conjecture holds for every complex abelian variety of dimension four.
Scope: All codimensions on abelian fourfolds. No restriction to Weil discriminant 1 is needed for this corollary.
Proved · version 3
If A is a complex abelian fourfold of Weil type with discriminant 1, the rational Hodge conjecture holds for A^m for every positive integer m.
Scope: All codimensions on powers of this specified Weil-type family.
Relationship not independently reviewed.
Connection in Hodge conjecture →Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
In this problem · publication v15
Special case · Proved
For m=1 this overlaps Markman’s fourfold corollary; m>1 covers selected varieties of dimension 4m. The discriminant-1 hypothesis is retained for the all-powers assertion.
Scope: Every power of a Weil-type fourfold with discriminant 1.
Limit: Does not assert the all-powers statement for arbitrary discriminants or arbitrary abelian varieties.
The all-abelian-fourfold theorem and the all-powers theorem intersect at a single Weil fourfold with discriminant 1.
One covers every abelian fourfold but not all its powers; the other covers all powers of a smaller family.
Proved · version 2
The rational Hodge conjecture holds for every complex abelian variety of dimension four.
Scope: All codimensions on abelian fourfolds. No restriction to Weil discriminant 1 is needed for this corollary.
Proved · version 3
If A is a complex abelian fourfold of Weil type with discriminant 1, the rational Hodge conjecture holds for A^m for every positive integer m.
Scope: All codimensions on powers of this specified Weil-type family.
Relationship not independently reviewed.
Connection in Hodge conjecture →Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
If A is a complex abelian fourfold of Weil type with discriminant 1, the rational Hodge conjecture holds for A^m for every positive integer m.
paraphrase · No upstream full text or code is republished by this record.
Salvatore Floccari · Lie Fu · Acceptance reported
arXiv v2 states final version, to appear in Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées; acceptance is source-reported.
Source revision: arxiv-v2. Observed Oct 10, 2026.
The cited work does not report AI involvement; this is not an assertion that no AI was used.
Source updated Feb 10, 2026.
The publisher records the published Floccari–Fu proof for Weil fourfolds of discriminant 1 and all their powers.
paraphrase · No upstream full text or code is republished by this record.
Salvatore Floccari · Lie Fu · Published · Publication date Jun 2026
Published in Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées 210 (June 2026), article 103876, DOI 10.1016/j.matpur.2026.103876. The author v2 remains separately pinned for theorem text.
Source revision: journal-2026-103876. Observed Oct 10, 2026.
The cited work does not report AI involvement; this is not an assertion that no AI was used.
Source updated Feb 10, 2026.
For a smooth projective complex variety X, every rational class in H²(X,Q) of type (1,1) is a rational combination of divisor classes.
paraphrase · No upstream full text or code is republished by this record.
Pierre Deligne · Published
Official Clay problem description; historical exposition, not a current literature survey.
Source revision: official-description. Observed Oct 10, 2026.
The cited work does not report AI involvement; this is not an assertion that no AI was used.
The rational Hodge conjecture holds for every complex abelian variety of dimension four.
paraphrase · No upstream full text or code is republished by this record.
Eyal Markman · Preprint
Author preprint at the cited revision; journal acceptance has not been established by this curation.
Source revision: arxiv-v2. Observed Oct 10, 2026.
The cited work does not report AI involvement; this is not an assertion that no AI was used.
Source updated Jun 8, 2025.
A September 2026 manuscript claiming results on powers of CM fourfolds was withdrawn by its author on 8 October 2026 after reassessing its contribution.
paraphrase · No upstream full text or code is republished by this record.
Ningyi Li · Withdrawn
Author withdrew v2 on 8 October 2026 after reassessing its contribution; no standalone publication planned.
Source revision: arxiv-v2-withdrawn. Observed Oct 10, 2026.
The cited work does not report AI involvement; this is not an assertion that no AI was used.
Source updated Oct 8, 2026.
Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.
Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.
Proved
Only the cited assertion with its exact assumptions. This report does not resolve the canonical Problem or establish independent OpenMath mathematical review.
Observed Oct 10, 2026 · Source passage →
Proved
Source dated Feb 10, 2026 · Observed Oct 10, 2026 · Source passage →
A September 2026 manuscript claiming results on powers of CM fourfolds was withdrawn by its author on 8 October 2026 after reassessing its contribution.
The withdrawal is not a refutation of rational Hodge or of the other cited results. This manuscript contributes no additional proved progress in this record.
Hodge conjecture · publication v13
A September 2026 manuscript claiming results on powers of CM fourfolds was withdrawn by its author on 8 October 2026 after reassessing its contribution.
The withdrawal is not a refutation of rational Hodge or of the other cited results. This manuscript contributes no additional proved progress in this record.
Hodge conjecture · publication v15