Theorem · version 3

Integral Hodge variant · counterexamples

Statement

The integral analogue of the Hodge conjecture is false: there exist integral Hodge classes on smooth projective complex varieties not represented by integral algebraic cycles.

Assumptions

  • Integral, rather than rational, coefficients.
  • Smooth projective complex varieties; the assertion is existential.

Scope

Atiyah–Hirzebruch counterexamples to the integral variant; not a counterexample to rational Hodge.

Evidence

Source reports

Connections

In this problem · publication v11 · Selected context

Hodge conjecture →

Different statement · related variant · Proved

Changing the coefficient ring changes the statement. Rational Hodge stays open; this refutation must never label the canonical Problem refuted.

Related statements

Integral coefficients ask for a stronger assertion and admit counterexamples, whereas the canonical question permits rational combinations.

An integral obstruction can disappear after tensoring with Q and does not refute rational Hodge.

Details & sources
rational Hodge holds in all codimensions →

Open · version 2

For every smooth projective variety X over C and 0 ≤ p ≤ dim X, the rational cycle-class map CH^p(X)⊗Q → H^{2p}(X,Q) ∩ H^{p,p}(X) is surjective.

  • Smooth, projective and defined over C.
  • Rational coefficients; the intersection is taken after complexification.

Scope: All varieties and codimensions. A representative may be a rational combination of cycles, without positivity or uniqueness.

Integral Hodge variant · counterexamples →

Proved · version 3

The integral analogue of the Hodge conjecture is false: there exist integral Hodge classes on smooth projective complex varieties not represented by integral algebraic cycles.

  • Integral, rather than rational, coefficients.
  • Smooth projective complex varieties; the assertion is existential.

Scope: Atiyah–Hirzebruch counterexamples to the integral variant; not a counterexample to rational Hodge.

Relationship not independently reviewed.

Connection in Hodge conjecture →

Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.

In this problem · publication v15

Hodge conjecture →

Different statement · related variant · Proved

Changing the coefficient ring changes the statement. Rational Hodge stays open; this refutation must never label the canonical Problem refuted.

Related statements

Integral coefficients ask for a stronger assertion and admit counterexamples, whereas the canonical question permits rational combinations.

An integral obstruction can disappear after tensoring with Q and does not refute rational Hodge.

Details & sources
rational Hodge holds in all codimensions →

Open · version 2

For every smooth projective variety X over C and 0 ≤ p ≤ dim X, the rational cycle-class map CH^p(X)⊗Q → H^{2p}(X,Q) ∩ H^{p,p}(X) is surjective.

  • Smooth, projective and defined over C.
  • Rational coefficients; the intersection is taken after complexification.

Scope: All varieties and codimensions. A representative may be a rational combination of cycles, without positivity or uniqueness.

Integral Hodge variant · counterexamples →

Proved · version 3

The integral analogue of the Hodge conjecture is false: there exist integral Hodge classes on smooth projective complex varieties not represented by integral algebraic cycles.

  • Integral, rather than rational, coefficients.
  • Smooth projective complex varieties; the assertion is existential.

Scope: Atiyah–Hirzebruch counterexamples to the integral variant; not a counterexample to rational Hodge.

Relationship not independently reviewed.

Connection in Hodge conjecture →

Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.

Sources

Deligne · official Hodge description →

Pierre Deligne · Published

Official Clay problem description; historical exposition, not a current literature survey.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: official-description. Observed Oct 10, 2026.

The cited work does not report AI involvement; this is not an assertion that no AI was used.

Official description PDF: official-description. External evidence linked; no OpenMath execution or independent reproduction is asserted.

History

Statement versions

Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.

Assessment history · 2

Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.

Record details
Claim ID
claim-integral-hodge-counterexamples
Statement version
3
SHA-256
d487bf2573dc9c32e0368758916fe6f348569c57b8d378725f9b48d0487a8a92

Publication records