Proved
Established implication or scoped theorem in cited mathematics ↗
Observed Oct 10, 2026
Theorem · version 2
If a polynomial-size pseudorandom generator G_k: {0,1}^k → {0,1}^{2k} has hardness H(G_k) ≥ 2^{k^ε} for some fixed ε > 0 and all sufficiently large k, then no P-natural property useful against P/poly exists.
A conditional barrier for this precise kind of circuit-lower-bound method; not for all mathematical proofs.
In this problem · publication v8 · Selected context
Proof barrier · Proved
This statement contributes context in its stated scope; it does not settle the canonical P versus NP question.
Scope: The natural-proofs barrier is conditional.
This is one indexed assertion in its own scope. No disjoint solved fraction, strongest-known ranking or additional parent resolution is inferred.
Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
In this problem · publication v14
Proof barrier · Proved
This statement contributes context in its stated scope; it does not settle the canonical P versus NP question.
Scope: The natural-proofs barrier is conditional.
This is one indexed assertion in its own scope. No disjoint solved fraction, strongest-known ranking or additional parent resolution is inferred.
Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
If a polynomial-size pseudorandom generator G_k: {0,1}^k → {0,1}^{2k} has hardness H(G_k) ≥ 2^{k^ε} for some fixed ε > 0 and all sufficiently large k, then no P-natural property useful against P/poly exists.
paraphrase · Only metadata and original OpenMath paraphrases are published; proof PDFs remain at their source.
Alexander Razborov · Steven Rudich · Published · Publication date 1994
Published author exposition or original paper.
Source revision: STOC-1994-author-paper. Observed Oct 10, 2026.
AI involvement is not reported by this cited source; this is not a claim of its absence.
Razborov–Rudich · Natural proofs — proof text: STOC-1994-author-paper. External source text. Its mathematical claims and independent OpenMath review are assessed separately.
Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.
Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.
Proved
Observed Oct 10, 2026 · Source passage →