Conjecture · version 1

The smooth four-dimensional Poincaré question

Statement

Every closed smooth four-manifold homotopy equivalent to the four-sphere is diffeomorphic to the standard smooth four-sphere.

Assumptions

  • This is a separate conjecture in dimension four; simple connectivity alone is insufficient for its hypothesis.
Dimension
4
Category
Smooth · diffeomorphism

Evidence

Connections

In this problem · publication v8 · Selected context

Poincaré conjecture →

Different statement · related variant · Open

Related statements

Homeomorphism and diffeomorphism are different requirements in dimension four.

The proved topological theorem does not settle the smooth conjecture.

Details & sources
The topological four-dimensional theorem →

Proved · version 1

Every closed topological four-manifold homotopy equivalent to the four-sphere is homeomorphic to the four-sphere.

  • Freedman’s topological conclusion does not identify a smooth structure or imply the smooth four-dimensional conjecture.

Scope: Freedman’s topological conclusion does not identify a smooth structure or imply the smooth four-dimensional conjecture.

The smooth four-dimensional Poincaré question →

Open · version 1

Every closed smooth four-manifold homotopy equivalent to the four-sphere is diffeomorphic to the standard smooth four-sphere.

  • This is a separate conjecture in dimension four; simple connectivity alone is insufficient for its hypothesis.

Scope: This is a separate conjecture in dimension four; simple connectivity alone is insufficient for its hypothesis.

Relationship not independently reviewed.

Connection in Poincaré conjecture →

Analogue

The four-dimensional smooth question concerns a different dimension and equivalence notion.

The three-dimensional theorem is fully proved; this analogue is not an unresolved part of it.

Details & sources
The topological three-dimensional Poincaré theorem →

Proved · version 2

Every closed, simply connected topological three-manifold is homeomorphic to the standard three-sphere.

  • Compact Hausdorff three-manifolds without boundary; simply connected includes connectedness.

Scope: Compact Hausdorff three-manifolds without boundary; simply connected includes connectedness.

The smooth four-dimensional Poincaré question →

Open · version 1

Every closed smooth four-manifold homotopy equivalent to the four-sphere is diffeomorphic to the standard smooth four-sphere.

  • This is a separate conjecture in dimension four; simple connectivity alone is insufficient for its hypothesis.

Scope: This is a separate conjecture in dimension four; simple connectivity alone is insufficient for its hypothesis.

Relationship not independently reviewed.

Connection in Poincaré conjecture →

Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.

In this problem · publication v13

Poincaré conjecture →

Different statement · related variant · Open

Related statements

Homeomorphism and diffeomorphism are different requirements in dimension four.

The proved topological theorem does not settle the smooth conjecture.

Details & sources
The topological four-dimensional theorem →

Proved · version 1

Every closed topological four-manifold homotopy equivalent to the four-sphere is homeomorphic to the four-sphere.

  • Freedman’s topological conclusion does not identify a smooth structure or imply the smooth four-dimensional conjecture.

Scope: Freedman’s topological conclusion does not identify a smooth structure or imply the smooth four-dimensional conjecture.

The smooth four-dimensional Poincaré question →

Open · version 1

Every closed smooth four-manifold homotopy equivalent to the four-sphere is diffeomorphic to the standard smooth four-sphere.

  • This is a separate conjecture in dimension four; simple connectivity alone is insufficient for its hypothesis.

Scope: This is a separate conjecture in dimension four; simple connectivity alone is insufficient for its hypothesis.

Relationship not independently reviewed.

Connection in Poincaré conjecture →

Analogue

The four-dimensional smooth question concerns a different dimension and equivalence notion.

The three-dimensional theorem is fully proved; this analogue is not an unresolved part of it.

Details & sources
The topological three-dimensional Poincaré theorem →

Proved · version 2

Every closed, simply connected topological three-manifold is homeomorphic to the standard three-sphere.

  • Compact Hausdorff three-manifolds without boundary; simply connected includes connectedness.

Scope: Compact Hausdorff three-manifolds without boundary; simply connected includes connectedness.

The smooth four-dimensional Poincaré question →

Open · version 1

Every closed smooth four-manifold homotopy equivalent to the four-sphere is diffeomorphic to the standard smooth four-sphere.

  • This is a separate conjecture in dimension four; simple connectivity alone is insufficient for its hypothesis.

Scope: This is a separate conjecture in dimension four; simple connectivity alone is insufficient for its hypothesis.

Relationship not independently reviewed.

Connection in Poincaré conjecture →

Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.

Sources

From Knots to Four-Manifolds →

Ciprian Manolescu · Published · Publication date 2026

Source-backed selection; publication and proof assessment are separate.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: icm-2026-doi-25M1806703. Observed Oct 12, 2026.

AI use is not reported in the selected source.

Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture →

John Morgan · Gang Tian · Published · Publication date 2007

Source-backed selection; publication and proof assessment are separate.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: clay-monograph-3-2007. Observed Oct 12, 2026.

AI use is not reported in the selected source.

The Poincaré Conjecture · official description →

  • §§1–3; dimension-three comparison on page 5 → · Original passage ↗
    Recorded wording

    Milnor distinguishes topological from smooth classification and explains why the distinctions disappear in dimension three. A homology sphere alone does not satisfy the Poincaré hypothesis.

    paraphrase · Follow the original source for authoritative statements and reuse terms.

John Milnor · Published

Source-backed selection; publication and proof assessment are separate.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: clay-description-observed-2026-10-12. Observed Oct 12, 2026.

AI use is not reported in the selected source.

A Lean Formalization of the Hamilton–Perelman Proof of the Three-Dimensional Poincaré Conjecture →

  • §1, Theorems 1–3; §3, release and verification → · Original passage ↗
    Recorded wording

    The authors report Lean proofs of the smooth theorem and Moise smoothing, yielding the topological theorem. Their release v0.1.3 report names commit 7a48598d35109aa99d1cc678e2724c213cdf4ff3 and audits the endpoint closures for the three standard Lean axioms, without sorryAx or project axioms.

    paraphrase · Follow the original source for authoritative statements and reuse terms.

Ziyang Qin · Yuan Liao · Ayush Khaitan · Bennett Chow · Preprint · Publication date Sep 27, 2026

Source-backed selection; publication and proof assessment are separate.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: arxiv-2609.33842v1. Observed Oct 12, 2026.

Authors report automated assistance; OpenMath has not independently assessed that workflow.

An AI-Assisted Formalization of the Poincaré Conjecture →

Zhiyuan Zhang · Axel Delaval · Leheng Chen · Jinxuan Chen · Jie Xu · Yuxuan Liao · Jiedong Jiang · Chunlei Liu · Bin Dong · Preprint · Publication date Oct 6, 2026

Source-backed selection; publication and proof assessment are separate.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: arxiv-2610.08329v1. Observed Oct 12, 2026.

Authors report automated assistance; OpenMath has not independently assessed that workflow.

Poincaré comparator integration verification →

  • Local integration verification; verification.json beside README → · Original passage ↗
    Recorded wording

    The project’s report records successful statement comparison and Lean/Nanoda checks on 28 September 2026 for proof commit 1876d7dc2c85325a3f62ce9776af98f910c5db04, permitting only the three standard axioms. Later documentation and import commits are not the tested revision; the report is project-supplied evidence.

    paraphrase · Follow the original source for authoritative statements and reuse terms.

FrenzyMath contributors · Project documentation

Project-supplied verification report at the pinned documentation revision. The 28 September date describes verification, not publication; publication date is not established.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: 432c38f2aa5a30efb13871292d17b4a3309a496a; bibliographic metadata corrected 2026-10-12. Observed Oct 12, 2026.

Authors report automated assistance; OpenMath has not independently assessed that workflow.

Mathlib · wanted Poincaré statements →

Mathlib contributors · Project documentation

Source-backed selection; publication and proof assessment are separate.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: 9454a4c25a2b923eb55dba3098f2d6ae0484d09b. Observed Oct 12, 2026.

AI use is not reported in the selected source.

History

Statement versions

Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.

Assessment history · 1

Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.

Record details
Claim ID
claim-poincare-smooth-four
Statement version
1
SHA-256
a720bdcc5b4d20114d6def3bf2dec78b3365e16d5b355b21b05fc9637321c536

Publication records