Proved
Historical bounds recorded in the paper ↗
Zhang, Maynard and Stadlmann bounded-gap results.
Observed Oct 13, 2026
Replaces an earlier source assessment. Version history ↓
Bound · version 2
Earlier version 2. View current version 3 →
For every real X, there are consecutive primes p < q with p ≥ X and q − p ≤ 600; in other words .
An unconditional upper bound on the recurring gap, attributed to Maynard; it does not imply every gap is this small.
In How small can prime gaps be? · publication v5
Compare the quantity and hypotheses within each group. A finite check, conditional theorem and proposed improvement cover different scopes.
| Result | Value | Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Gaps at most 600, infinitely often → Proved Result date not recorded | ≤ 600 | Unconditional bound for gaps between consecutive primes occurring infinitely often. |
In How small can prime gaps be? · publication v6
Compare the quantity and hypotheses within each group. A finite check, conditional theorem and proposed improvement cover different scopes.
| Result | Value | Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Gaps at most 600, infinitely often → Proved Selected source date: | ≤ 600 | Unconditional bound for gaps between consecutive primes occurring infinitely often. |
Proved
Zhang, Maynard and Stadlmann bounded-gap results.
Observed Oct 13, 2026
Replaces an earlier source assessment. Version history ↓
In this problem · publication v5 · Selected context
Bound · Proved
Scope: Maynard’s multidimensional sieve lowered the bound in 2013.
Limit: The target H₁ = 2 is not established.
Nested results concern the same prime-gap limit; they are not separate portions of a solved problem.
Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
In this problem · publication v6
Bound · Proved
Scope: Maynard’s multidimensional sieve lowered the bound in 2013.
Limit: The target H₁ = 2 is not established.
Nested results concern the same prime-gap limit; they are not separate portions of a solved problem.
Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
The preliminary draft states H₁ ≤ 212 and explains the analytic and exact rational calculations. Its appendix reports a formal deduction with analytic and variational hypotheses.
paraphrase · OpenMath supplies original paraphrases and links; no proof text is republished.
François Charton · Letong Hong · Kenny Lau · Ken Ono · Guillaume Remy · Ho Chung Siu · Ashvin A. Swaminathan · Jesse Thorner · Yunzhou Xie · Preprint · Publication date Sep 3, 2026
Public manuscript or exposition; publication does not imply independent OpenMath review.
Source revision: 2026-09-03. Observed Oct 13, 2026.
The nine authors supply the mathematics, building on Julia Stadlmann and earlier sieve work. AxiomProver is credited with generating a formal deduction; this is not a claim that the model independently discovered the mathematical bound.
Source updated Sep 3, 2026.
Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.
Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.
Proved
Zhang, Maynard and Stadlmann bounded-gap results.
Observed Oct 13, 2026 · Source passage →
Replaces an earlier source assessment; see the original source for its history.