Proved
Formal deduction from Bombieri–Vinogradov ↗
The implication to the 246 bound, not a Lean proof of its analytic premise.
PrimeGapsLib: a formal deduction of the 246 bound · README main results; PrimeGaps/Bounded246.lean →
Observed Oct 13, 2026
Theorem · version 1
Assuming the precise BombieriVinogradov statement in PrimeGapsLib, infinitely many consecutive-prime gaps are at most 246.
The certificate and downstream sieve deduction are formalized; the analytic distribution theorem is a premise in this endpoint.
Proved
The implication to the 246 bound, not a Lean proof of its analytic premise.
PrimeGapsLib: a formal deduction of the 246 bound · README main results; PrimeGaps/Bounded246.lean →
Observed Oct 13, 2026
Complete formal proof reported externally
Complete as an implication with the stated premise. This is the public 246 artifact, not the later reported 212 certificate.
Statement match: Linked by OpenMath · independent review separate · checked Oct 13, 2026
bombieriVinogradov_implies_frequently_prime_gap_le_246Commit 1faa7b14e82ddebc2772dfb9153922f01b106477
In this problem · publication v7 · Selected context
Conditional result · Proved
Scope: The public Lean theorem formalizes the deduction to 246 from Bombieri–Vinogradov.
Limit: The cited mathematical 246 result is unconditional, but this formal theorem does not prove its analytic premise.
Nested results concern the same prime-gap limit; they are not separate portions of a solved problem.
Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
The public revision proves prime-gap bounds of 246 assuming Bombieri–Vinogradov and includes numerical certificates. It does not contain the 212 formalization reported in the later paper.
paraphrase · OpenMath supplies original paraphrases and links; no proof text is republished.
Axiom Math · PrimeGapsLib contributors · Project documentation · Publication date Aug 18, 2026
Public formal source; build and independent mathematical review are separate checks.
Public source inspected for statement and assumptions; this proof project has not been executed by OpenMath.
Source revision: 1faa7b14e82ddebc2772dfb9153922f01b106477. Observed Oct 13, 2026.
Axiom Math’s formalization work concerns proof translation and certificates; no independent discovery credit is assigned from the repository alone.
Source updated Aug 18, 2026.
PrimeGapsLib: a formal deduction of the 246 bound — pinned source: 1faa7b14e82ddebc2772dfb9153922f01b106477.
The published Polymath8b argument establishes an unconditional recurring prime gap at most 246; the twin-prime target remains out of reach.
paraphrase · OpenMath supplies original paraphrases and links; no proof text is republished.
D. H. J. Polymath · Published · Publication date 2014
Peer-reviewed historical result.
Source revision: 2014. Observed Oct 13, 2026.
No AI contribution is asserted by this source record.
Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.
Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.
Proved
The implication to the 246 bound, not a Lean proof of its analytic premise.
Observed Oct 13, 2026 · Source passage →