Open
Twin primes remain unresolved ↗
H₁ = 2 remains unresolved despite finite upper bounds.
Observed Oct 13, 2026
Conjecture · version 2
For every real bound X there are consecutive primes p < q with p ≥ X and q − p = 2; equivalently .
The twin-prime target. Finite upper bounds larger than two leave it unresolved.
Compare the quantity and hypotheses within each group. A finite check, conditional theorem and proposed improvement cover different scopes.
| Result | Value | Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Gaps of two infinitely often → Open Result date not recorded | 2 | The twin-prime target: gaps of two recur infinitely often. Open. |
Open
H₁ = 2 remains unresolved despite finite upper bounds.
Observed Oct 13, 2026
In this problem · publication v4 · Selected context
Primary formulation · Open
Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
In this problem · publication v7
Primary formulation · Open
Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
The preliminary draft states H₁ ≤ 212 and explains the analytic and exact rational calculations. Its appendix reports a formal deduction with analytic and variational hypotheses.
paraphrase · OpenMath supplies original paraphrases and links; no proof text is republished.
François Charton · Letong Hong · Kenny Lau · Ken Ono · Guillaume Remy · Ho Chung Siu · Ashvin A. Swaminathan · Jesse Thorner · Yunzhou Xie · Preprint · Publication date Sep 3, 2026
Public manuscript or exposition; publication does not imply independent OpenMath review.
Source revision: 2026-09-03. Observed Oct 13, 2026.
The nine authors supply the mathematics, building on Julia Stadlmann and earlier sieve work. AxiomProver is credited with generating a formal deduction; this is not a claim that the model independently discovered the mathematical bound.
Source updated Sep 3, 2026.
The published Polymath8b argument establishes an unconditional recurring prime gap at most 246; the twin-prime target remains out of reach.
paraphrase · OpenMath supplies original paraphrases and links; no proof text is republished.
D. H. J. Polymath · Published · Publication date 2014
Peer-reviewed historical result.
Source revision: 2014. Observed Oct 13, 2026.
No AI contribution is asserted by this source record.
Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.
Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.
Open
H₁ = 2 remains unresolved despite finite upper bounds.
Observed Oct 13, 2026 · Source passage →