Bound · version 2

At least 88.762% simple OR on-line zeros, asymptotically

Statement

Let N_{s∪0}(T) count zeros that are simple or on the critical line, with multiplicity in the union. Then liminf N_{s∪0}(T)/N(T) ≥ C₂ = (1+2√2+2k₀)/(3+2√2) = 0.8876200082… .

Assumptions

  • Classical ζ; T → ∞; k₀ = 3/2 − cot(1/√2)/√2.
  • Union means simple OR on-line (or both); total N includes multiplicity.

Scope

A union bound that constrains multiple off-line zeros, without excluding simple off-line zeros.

Explanation

Bounds & computations · 1

Compare the quantity and hypotheses within each group. A finite check, conditional theorem and proposed improvement cover different scopes.

Simple or on-line zeros
ResultValueConditions
At least 88.762% simple OR on-line zeros, asymptotically →

Proved

Selected source date:

≥ 0.8876200082…Asymptotic liminf for the union, counted with multiplicity; not the simple-on-line intersection.

Evidence

Source reports

Connections

In this problem · publication v7 · Selected context

Riemann hypothesis →

Supporting result · Proved

This must not be labeled “88.762% on the critical line.” A simple off-line zero belongs to this union.

Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.

In this problem · publication v13

Riemann hypothesis →

Supporting result · Proved

This must not be labeled “88.762% on the critical line.” A simple off-line zero belongs to this union.

Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.

Sources

Lamzouri · another proof and further proportions →

Youness Lamzouri · Preprint

Author preprint at the cited revision; journal acceptance has not been established by this curation.

Revision & attribution

Source revision: arxiv-v2. Observed Oct 10, 2026.

Lamzouri gives a human-authored proof inspired by the Claude result. Appendix A reports AxiomProver (Axiom Math) autoformalization; this is a different role from discovering the original bound.

Source updated Sep 8, 2026.

History

Statement versions

Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.

Assessment history · 1

Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.

Proved

Scoped theorem in cited source ↗

Only the exact statement, domain and revision cited by this Claim; this is not a resolution of classical RH or independent OpenMath expert assessment.

Source dated Sep 8, 2026 · Observed Oct 10, 2026 · Source passage →

Record details
Claim ID
claim-rh-simple-or-critical-line-proportion
Statement version
2
SHA-256
76bed979603793a202cd2696dc7bec20ae7565c723c0ad084c3c75edefb2bda1

Publication records