Probability · Convex geometry · Analysis · Conjecture

Kannan–Lovász–Simonovits conjecture

Is there a universal upper bound on the Poincaré constant of every isotropic log-concave probability measure, independent of its dimension?

ProposedOpenMath assessment · Oct 13, 2026

Earlier version 5 of this page. View current →

Overview

Current assessment

Two October manuscripts propose a dimension-free Poincaré bound. Song–Zhang’s second revision strengthens its first iterated-logarithm estimate; Bizeul–Klartag–Lehec give a separate argument using a Song–Zhang criterion. Independent assessment is pending.

Open questions

The target is a dimension-independent Poincaré bound for isotropic log-concave probability measures.

Latest

Precise statement

For a probability measure μ on ℝⁿ with log-concave density, isotropic means mean zero and covariance matrix I. Log-concave means the density is e^(−V) for a convex function V; V = +∞ is allowed where the density is zero. Its Poincaré constant C_P(μ) is the least constant in Var_μ(f) ≤ C_P(μ) ∫|∇f|² dμ for locally Lipschitz f with the required finite integrals. The proposed bound must use one constant for all positive dimensions and all such measures. Equivalent isoperimetric formulations change constants; a dimension-dependent bound alone does not settle the question.

Definitions

Isotropic measure
A probability measure with mean zero and identity covariance. This normalization removes linear scaling before comparing Poincaré constants across dimensions.

Question paraphrased by OpenMath. Original wording is available in the sources.

Landscape

Figures and explorable examples. Selecting a statement opens its exact wording.

State of the problem

How the bound fell

From the target, a constant for every dimension, down through the proved bounds that grow with n. The top two rungs are 2026 proposals; everything below is proved.

Reading boundary. Lower rungs do not imply higher ones. The two top rungs are proposals with assessment pending, not established results.

  1. The question: one constant for every n

    Two October 2026 manuscripts claim CP(μ) ≤ C with C independent of n. Both are proposed; assessment is pending.

  2. Proposed first: an iterated logarithm

    Song–Zhang’s first revision: a bound that grows like 16log*(n+2), slower than any iterated logarithm.

  3. Best proved bound: logarithmic

    The strongest proved dimension-dependent bound before the 2026 proposals.

  4. Earlier proved bounds

    Each grows with the dimension n; together they show how the exponent fell from √n to logarithmic.

Text version

The conjecture asks for C_P(μ) ≤ C with C independent of the dimension n. Proved bounds have fallen from C√n (Lee–Vempala) to sub-polynomial (Chen), poly-logarithmic (Klartag–Lehec) and C log n (Klartag). In October 2026 Song–Zhang proposed first 16^{log*(n+2)} and then a constant, and Bizeul–Klartag–Lehec proposed a constant by a separate argument.

Isotropic log-concave probability measures on ℝⁿ; C_P is the Poincaré constant. Constants C differ between rungs; only the growth in n is compared.

  1. CP ≤ C (proposed)

    Proposed

    A uniform Poincaré bound for isotropic log-concave measures

    One shared mathematical assertion with separately attributed October proof proposals. Neither paper receives an independent-review label from this curation.

    A uniform Poincaré bound for isotropic log-concave measures →

  2. CP ≤ C·16log*(n+2) (proposed)

    Proposed

    The first revision’s iterated-logarithm estimate

    A historical proof proposal with genuine dimension dependence. The second revision proposes O(1); its evidence is not retroactively attached to this assertion.

    The first revision’s iterated-logarithm estimate →

  3. CP ≤ C log n (Klartag)

    Proved

    A logarithmic bound

    A proved dimension-dependent bound; it does not give one constant for every dimension.

    A logarithmic bound →

  4. CP ≤ C (log n)k (Klartag–Lehec)

    Proved

    A poly-logarithmic bound

    A proved dimension-dependent bound; it does not give one constant for every dimension.

    A poly-logarithmic bound →

  5. CP ≤ Cε nε (Chen)

    Proved

    A sub-polynomial bound

    A proved dimension-dependent bound; it does not give one constant for every dimension.

    A sub-polynomial bound →

  6. CP ≤ C√n (Lee–Vempala)

    Proved

    A square-root bound

    A proved dimension-dependent bound; it does not give one constant for every dimension.

    A square-root bound →

Sources & review

Authored by OpenMath curation on 2026-10-21 (AI-assisted curation). Independent review of this visual explanation is pending; linked assertions and relationships have their own assessments.

Results

The question 1

Proposed 1

  • Proposed
    The first revision’s iterated-logarithm estimate

    A historical proof proposal with genuine dimension dependence.

    ≤ C · 16log*(n+2)Song & Zhang 2026

Conditional implications 1

  • Proved
    Transporting the proposed bound beyond isotropic measures

    This affine-transfer implication does not establish the premise or a numerical value of C.

    Bizeul et al. 2026

Related advances 4

  • Proved
    A square-root bound

    A proved dimension-dependent bound; it does not give one constant for every dimension.

    Lee & Vempala 2024 · per Bizeul et al. 2026
  • Proved
    A sub-polynomial bound

    A proved dimension-dependent bound; it does not give one constant for every dimension.

    Chen 2021 · per Bizeul et al. 2026
  • Proved
    A poly-logarithmic bound

    A proved dimension-dependent bound; it does not give one constant for every dimension.

    Klartag & Lehec 2022 · per Bizeul et al. 2026
  • Proved
    A logarithmic bound

    A proved dimension-dependent bound; it does not give one constant for every dimension.

    Klartag 2023 · per Bizeul et al. 2026

Connections

Consequences 1

Assuming A uniform Poincaré bound for isotropic log-concave measuresProposed

  • Transporting the proposed bound beyond isotropic measures

    Conditional

    If every isotropic log-concave probability measure has Poincaré constant at most C, then every full-dimensional log-concave probability measure μ with covariance Σ satisfies C_P(μ) ≤ C ‖Σ‖op.

    Limit This affine-transfer implication does not establish the premise or a numerical value of C. Singular covariance requires a formulation on its affine support.

    Sources & review

    Source-grounded explanation · independent explanation review: pending.

Approaches

How the problem is attacked, and what each line of attack cannot yet reach.

Normalize before comparing constants

Isotropy removes linear scale and direction: the mean is zero and covariance is the identity. Affine transport relates the general covariance case to this target.

Cannot yet reach A bound for one dimension or one family of densities does not supply the uniform theorem.

Sources & review

Supporting statements

Source-grounded explanation · independent explanation review: pending.

Timeline

  1. The second revision proposes a constant boundProposal

    Song and Zhang replace the earlier asymptotic target with a uniform bound.

    This source revision supersedes the earlier passage but preserves its historical identity and statement.

  2. Another manuscript presents a proofProposal

    Bizeul, Klartag and Lehec present a route through cumulants and suspension using a Song–Zhang criterion.

    Different authors and arguments do not by themselves constitute independent validation.

  3. A slowly dimension-dependent bound is proposedProposal

    Song and Zhang’s first revision states an inverse Cheeger estimate with iterated-logarithm dependence.

    The corresponding Poincaré bound is squared and remains dimension dependent.

  4. The convex-geometric conjectureFoundation

    The cited manuscripts trace KLS to Kannan, Lovász and Simonovits’ isoperimetric work.

    The reader uses the equivalent Poincaré formulation up to universal constants.

Full history with sources →

Evidence

Evidence by kind
Literature

2 preprints

Status OpenMath assessment · Oct 13, 2026.

Formal

None linked

Reported in sources: No linked formal proof project for the full KLS theorem was found in these primary sources. The October proposals remain under assessment; publication and model checks are not independent validation.

Computation

None recorded

Review

Not yet reviewed

OpenMath assessment: Two October manuscripts propose a dimension-free Poincaré bound. Song–Zhang’s second revision strengthens its first iterated-logarithm estimate; Bizeul–Klartag–Lehec give a separate argument using a Song–Zhang criterion. Independent assessment is pending.

Source comparison and reader curation; independent mathematical assessment remains pending.

OpenMath pilot collection · OpenMath source curation · assessed Oct 13, 2026 · review due Jan 13, 2027

Collection last checked Oct 13, 2026.

Sources

Choose a starting point below. Each result links to its exact statement, cited passages and checks.

Start here

Bibliography 2

Research activity · 1 entry

Research direction

Review the current proof proposals

Compare the current revisions, the high-order tilt criterion and the later cumulant/suspension argument.

No independent review verdict or executable formal proof is recorded in this source selection.

Related statements · context, not additional proved progress

An O(1) Bound for the KLS Constant — second revision · sources & artifacts →

Presenting a proof of the Kannan–Lovász–Simonovits conjecture · sources & artifacts →

Selected literature; source observations and coverage limits are retained in the publication details.

Contributors

Song–Zhang and Bizeul–Klartag–Lehec own separate manuscripts. Their AI disclosures assign models proof exploration, ideas and checking; the authors retain mathematical responsibility. Bizeul–Klartag–Lehec explicitly use a Song–Zhang criterion, which is kept visible as a dependency.

Authors & roles

Presenting a proof of the Kannan–Lovász–Simonovits conjecture →

Pierre Bizeul · Boaz Klartag · Joseph Lehec

The authors credit ChatGPT with many proof ideas and arguments, and credit the suspension idea and exposition to the human authors. Their approach uses a criterion of Song and Zhang; these are distinct papers with a mathematical dependency, not wholly independent proofs.

These are source credits; they do not imply OpenMath accounts, endorsements or independent mathematical review.

Record details
Record version
5
Classification
MSC2020 52A23 / 60E15
Prerequisite level
graduate

Assess both proposed arguments, their shared dependencies and manuscript revisions. No formal proof project for the full theorem is linked in this source selection.

Source observations & version history →