OpenMath · prime note
ProvedSource label: Known theorem in authored reference note
Source status date unavailable · Observed Oct 1, 2026
The cited source item and version only; this is not an independent OpenMath assessment.
Number theory MSC2020 11A41
QuestionResolution scope has not been assessed in this publication.
OpenMath assessment · decided Oct 1, 2026
Viewing pinned publication v2. View the current publication →
For every natural number n, does there exist a prime p with n < p?
Natural numbers and ordinary primality. This strict formulation follows by applying the pinned at-or-above theorem at n + 1.
Question paraphrased by OpenMath. Use the cited source and locator for authoritative wording.
Resolution scope has not been assessed in this publication.
OpenMath assessment · decided Oct 1, 2026 · Elementary prime results · OpenMath staff
OpenMath decision · Elementary prime results
Established result supported by the cited note and pinned mathlib statement. The local exercise tests exact Lean inputs, not novelty.
OpenMath staff · Oct 1, 2026 · Recheck by Mar 30, 2027
Wording, natural-number assumptions and pinned source correspondence checked by staff. Independent mathematical review remains pending.
Independent mathematical review: pending.
Source label: Known theorem in authored reference note
Source status date unavailable · Observed Oct 1, 2026
The cited source item and version only; this is not an independent OpenMath assessment.
Source label: Proved declaration Nat.exists_infinite_primes
Source status date unavailable · Observed Oct 1, 2026
The cited source item and version only; this is not an independent OpenMath assessment.
Original exposition under CC BY 4.0; exact spans and hashes retained.
Statement correspondence, execution, proof completeness, reproduction and mathematical review remain separate assessments.
Source-level staff correspondence. A passing Run does not independently confirm informal/formal alignment.
Exact commit 32d24245c7a1 · Checked Oct 1, 2026
Nat.exists_infinite_primes → n < p without shifting n ↗
Treating the returned n ≤ p as a direct proof of n < p is invalid. The recorded broken input exposes this mismatch; applying the theorem at n + 1 repairs the route.
Exact commit 32d24245c7a1 · Checked Oct 1, 2026
Checks concern exact versioned inputs from the linked Tasks. The latest six recorded executions are shown here; their proof policy, correspondence, reproduction and review are assessed separately. Staff repeat instructions are included in the research record export.
Formalize a prime strictly above every bound: all recent checks →
Published after staff preview and source checks. This page covers the cited items; it does not represent a complete list of problems or a literature-wide review.
OpenMath staff · full-text · CC-BY-4.0
Licensed source links and exact source spans; attribution retained. Rights / source terms
prime-infinitude:entry:0:v1mathlib contributors · licensed-excerpt · Apache-2.0
Licensed source links and exact source spans; attribution retained. Rights / source terms
prime-infinitude:entry:1:v1Initial checked pilot publication; source attribution, rights, wording and coverage reviewed by OpenMath staff.
Refine the maintained cluster: link a distinct prime-divisor prerequisite; retain the strict-bound exercise as a Task on the infinitude Problem.
Add cited resolution scope and consolidate equivalent prime formulations and supporting Claims; mathematical evidence and execution review remain distinct.
Publish checked pilot curation with canonical Claims and scoped progress; preserve exact source revisions, assumptions, coverage limits and historical publications. External artifacts and OpenMath execution remain distinct.
Reviewed reader correction: preserve assertion history, exact citations and scoped assessments; task evidence names its exact Claim target.
Reviewed reader correction: preserve assertion history, exact citations and scoped assessments; task evidence names its exact Claim target.
Reviewed reader correction: preserve assertion history, exact citations and scoped assessments; task evidence names its exact Claim target.
Reviewed reader correction: preserve assertion history, exact citations and scoped assessments; task evidence names its exact Claim target.