Source · Paper

Avi Wigderson · Mathematics and Computation

PublishedPublication date 2019
Open paper ↗

Reading source record author-draft-2019-08-06. View default cited record →

Overview

The precise statements and locators cited in this P versus NP research record.

Published author exposition or original paper.

Passages

The exact passages cited in OpenMath. Each passage identifies how its wording was recorded.

Passage index · 9
  1. §5.2.1, Theorem 5.3
  2. §3.5, NP versus coNP
  3. §4.1, polynomial hierarchy; P = NP collapse discussion
  4. Theorem 5.5 [KL82], §5.2.1
  5. Theorem 4.1 [Lad75], §4.2
  6. §5.2.1, Theorem 5.3 and Conjecture 5.4
  7. Definition 4.7 and §4.5
  8. §4.4–4.5, Definition 4.7 and discussion
  9. §12.4, algebraic reductions and completeness
Passage 1 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

§5.2.1, Theorem 5.3

If NP is not contained in P/poly, then P ≠ NP.

Passage details

Passage ID: pnp-entry-circuits-imply-separation:v1

Source item: circuits-imply-separation

Source record: pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06

Passage 2 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

§3.5, NP versus coNP

If NP ≠ coNP, then P ≠ NP.

Passage details

Passage ID: pnp-entry-conp-implies-separation:v1

Source item: conp-implies-separation

Source record: pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06

Passage 3 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

§4.1, polynomial hierarchy; P = NP collapse discussion

If P = NP, then PH = P.

Passage details

Passage ID: pnp-entry-hierarchy-collapse:v1

Source item: hierarchy-collapse

Source record: pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06

Passage 4 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

Theorem 5.5 [KL82], §5.2.1

If NP is contained in P/poly, then PH = Σ₂^P.

Passage details

Passage ID: pnp-entry-karp-lipton:v1

Source item: karp-lipton

Source record: pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06

Passage 5 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

Theorem 4.1 [Lad75], §4.2

If P ≠ NP, then some languages in NP are neither in P nor NP-complete under polynomial-time many-one reductions.

Passage details

Passage ID: pnp-entry-ladner:v1

Source item: ladner

Source record: pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06

Passage 6 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

§5.2.1, Theorem 5.3 and Conjecture 5.4

NP is not contained in P/poly.

Passage details

Passage ID: pnp-entry-np-circuits:v1

Source item: np-circuits

Source record: pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06

Passage 7 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

Definition 4.7 and §4.5

There exists a polynomial-time-computable function that is hard to invert on average for probabilistic polynomial-time algorithms.

Passage details

Passage ID: pnp-entry-one-way:v1

Source item: one-way

Source record: pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06

Passage 8 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

§4.4–4.5, Definition 4.7 and discussion

If standard one-way functions exist, then P ≠ NP.

Passage details

Passage ID: pnp-entry-owf-implies-separation:v1

Source item: owf-implies-separation

Source record: pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06

Passage 9 · OpenMath paraphrasePermalink

§12.4, algebraic reductions and completeness

Over a field of characteristic zero, VP and VNP are distinct.

Passage details

Passage ID: pnp-entry-vp-vnp:v1

Source item: vp-vnp

Source record: pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06

Used in

Explicit citations in versioned problem publications. A citation records a use; it does not confer proof or independent verification.

P versus NP →

Problem publication v14

General NP circuit lower bounds would separate P and NP →

Source assessment

Proved

Established implication or scoped theorem in cited mathematics

A one-direction sufficient condition; the converse is not established.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

Connection

Nonuniform general NP circuit lower bounds would suffice for P ≠ NP.

NP versus coNP would separate P and NP →

Source assessment

Proved

Established implication or scoped theorem in cited mathematics

The implication does not establish its premise.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

Connection

Separating NP from coNP would also separate P from NP.

If P = NP, the polynomial hierarchy collapses to P →

Source assessment

Proved

Established implication or scoped theorem in cited mathematics

An asymptotic complexity-class consequence, not a practical algorithm implementation.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

Polynomial NP circuits would collapse the hierarchy →

Source assessment

Proved

Established implication or scoped theorem in cited mathematics

The Karp–Lipton implication; the circuit containment premise remains unresolved.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

If P ≠ NP, intermediate problems exist →

Source assessment

Proved

Established implication or scoped theorem in cited mathematics

Existence of NP-intermediate languages; not a classification of specific natural candidates.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

NP lacks polynomial-size general circuits →

Source assessment

Open

Unresolved assertion in the cited scope

A stronger circuit-complexity target than P ≠ NP.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

Standard one-way functions exist →

Source assessment

Open

Unresolved assertion in the cited scope

Average-case cryptographic hardness; stronger than merely worst-case NP hardness.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

One-way functions would separate P and NP →

Source assessment

Proved

Established implication or scoped theorem in cited mathematics

The reverse implication is not established; P ≠ NP alone is not a security guarantee.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

Connection

Average-case one-wayness is a stronger sufficient hardness premise.

VP versus VNP →

Source assessment

Open

Unresolved assertion in the cited scope

An algebraic analogue; no equivalence to Boolean P versus NP is asserted.

Observed Oct 10, 2026

Problem context · 11 citations

History

Conditional existence of intermediate problems

Connection

VP versus VNP is an algebraic complexity analogue, with field operations and polynomial families.

Files

Linked manuscripts, code and data. External proof reports, statement correspondence and OpenMath execution are separate checks.

PDF

Avi Wigderson · Mathematics and Computation — proof text ↗

Manuscript / exposition · external

External source text. Its mathematical claims and independent OpenMath review are assessed separately.

Resource revision: author-draft-2019-08-06

File checksum

SHA-256 for this linked file. A matching checksum identifies the same bytes; it does not assess the mathematics.

c6b72d0487d31b7d7173266c8d6706649607c6615defb7e2b6c2395782ab1829

Credits

Recorded authorship

Avi Wigderson

AI involvement not reported

AI involvement is not reported by this cited source; this is not a claim of its absence.

Versions

OpenMath source records preserve exact citations. Observation dates order these records; they do not establish the latest upstream paper or proof.

  1. author-draft-2019-08-06 · selectedObserved Oct 10, 2026 · used in current publications

    Avi Wigderson · Mathematics and Computation

Record details
Source ID
pnp-book
Record ID
pnp-book@author-draft-2019-08-06
Recorded title
Avi Wigderson · Mathematics and Computation
Revision
author-draft-2019-08-06
Observed
Oct 10, 2026
Source updated
Not recorded
Content SHA-256
c6b72d0487d31b7d7173266c8d6706649607c6615defb7e2b6c2395782ab1829
Update method
Manual primary-source check; changes require a new source version and staff publication.
Identifier policy
Source URL and exact theorem/section locator; no inferred identity merge.
Check interval
30 days
Rights
metadata-link
License
Full-text redistribution rights not asserted

Only metadata and original OpenMath paraphrases are published; proof PDFs remain at their source.

Source terms ↗