Open
Unresolved assertion in the cited scope ↗
Avi Wigderson · Mathematics and Computation · §12.4, algebraic reductions and completeness →
Observed Oct 10, 2026
Conjecture · version 2
Over a field of characteristic zero, VP and VNP are distinct.
An algebraic analogue; no equivalence to Boolean P versus NP is asserted.
Open
Avi Wigderson · Mathematics and Computation · §12.4, algebraic reductions and completeness →
Observed Oct 10, 2026
In this problem · publication v9 · Selected context
Different statement · related variant · Open
This statement contributes context in its stated scope; it does not settle the canonical P versus NP question.
VP versus VNP is an algebraic complexity analogue, with field operations and polynomial families.
No equivalence or implication to the classical Boolean question is asserted.
Open · version 2
Over a field of characteristic zero, VP and VNP are distinct.
Scope: An algebraic analogue; no equivalence to Boolean P versus NP is asserted.
Open · version 3
There exists a language in NP that is not decidable by any deterministic polynomial-time algorithm.
Scope: The conjectural negative answer to the same canonical question.
Relationship not independently reviewed.
Connection in P versus NP →Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
In this problem · publication v14
Different statement · related variant · Open
This statement contributes context in its stated scope; it does not settle the canonical P versus NP question.
VP versus VNP is an algebraic complexity analogue, with field operations and polynomial families.
No equivalence or implication to the classical Boolean question is asserted.
Open · version 2
Over a field of characteristic zero, VP and VNP are distinct.
Scope: An algebraic analogue; no equivalence to Boolean P versus NP is asserted.
Open · version 3
There exists a language in NP that is not decidable by any deterministic polynomial-time algorithm.
Scope: The conjectural negative answer to the same canonical question.
Relationship not independently reviewed.
Connection in P versus NP →Relationship not independently reviewed. This concerns its use in this problem.
Over a field of characteristic zero, VP and VNP are distinct.
paraphrase · Only metadata and original OpenMath paraphrases are published; proof PDFs remain at their source.
Avi Wigderson · Published · Publication date 2019
Published author exposition or original paper.
Source revision: author-draft-2019-08-06. Observed Oct 10, 2026.
AI involvement is not reported by this cited source; this is not a claim of its absence.
Avi Wigderson · Mathematics and Computation — proof text: author-draft-2019-08-06. External source text. Its mathematical claims and independent OpenMath review are assessed separately.
There exists a language in NP that is not decidable by any deterministic polynomial-time algorithm.
paraphrase · Only metadata and original OpenMath paraphrases are published; proof PDFs remain at their source.
Stephen Cook · Published
Published author exposition or original paper.
Source revision: official-description-sha256-018f3d473d16. Observed Oct 10, 2026.
AI involvement is not reported by this cited source; this is not a claim of its absence.
Statement versions and problem publication versions are separate. A new publication can update context or sources while retaining the same statement.
Assessments retained in these publication records. Earlier statement versions retain their own source histories.
Open
Observed Oct 10, 2026 · Source passage →